Looking for:
Acdsee pro 8 system requirements free download |
Acdsee pro 8 system requirements free download.What can ACDSee Free do for you?
Either way, check out our Video Tutorial Resource Center for tips, tricks and tutorials! Stay informed. We have something for everyone who is interested in digital photography and photo editing. Want to learn more about ACDSee in a live, interactive setting? Sign up for the next workshop! ACDSee Free is only a file browser.
To edit your photos, manage your files, and unlock destinations you may not know exist, try ACDSee Photo Studio Ultimate free for 30 days!
Learn More. To activate your software, to validate your subscriptions, or to access online services, you will need a valid email address and an internet connection. Online Help. Get free updates and workshops, exclusive offers, photography tips, and much more! And batch renaming. Ever since about v4, ACDsee started cramming "feature" upon "feature" into what was once the best, fastest and lightest image viewer available.
Nowdays it's over It's just rediculous. Especially the "pro" version. If "pro" means a product is intended for professionals, then it's safe to asume they're using OTHER professional tools to edit and organize their photos.
I have never ever used an "edit" funcion in ACDsee. All I want is is a super fast image viewer that instantly opens up any image file format and can equally quickly scroll through hundreds of images.
And that's it. Unfortunately, ACDsee has steered away from performance and seems to be focused on being the jack of all trades, when all we need is a master of one: speed.
If you don't need the advanced features in the PRO version for developing your raw images or editing jpgs why not go for the cheaper non pro version with less features, or just use that that old version you have, or any other viewer of your choice. I think you are spot on with your own comment saying ACDSee is "fast enough".
I want FAST, not "fast enough". And it's not about pro vs non-pro or cost. Cost isn't the issue and they are both equal in speed.
That it's selling point. And it was good and fast enough at it. Because with all due respect for ACDSee, Lightroom is of course a way more advanced platform for a photography workflow and editing. Most users I know have a 2-step workflow. First use a fast tool to go through the first selection proces and then import the rest into Lightroom.
Being the absolute fastest in speeding up that workflow. Peter v. Nice to have it all in one tool! One thing ACDSee doesn't have is working with layers like photoshop can, pity. What do you think is even better in LR? I have a very high specced workstation certainly no issues there, and sure, ACDSee is fairly fast, basic scrolling through resized jpg images isn't much too worry. But the thumb building sure isn't fast with Raws and large tiffs and the initial tree building when having a lot folders and of images in the folder is slow and crashes are still common.
And speed is subjective of course. What you find fast enough might be slow in my perception. Now -that- is really fast, makes ACDSee feel like a turtle.. I'm not saying they shouldn't try to make it an all-in-one tool.
Nice for sure for certain users will have a broader sell. The only thing I'd like to see is tool developers in general focus on really speeding up their tool.
Everybody wants speed. Not everybody wants all their new features. But that's not only ACDSee btw. When I look at my raw images on the hard disk, their thumbs appear almost instantaneously because I use the database feature in ACDSee called "catalogue folders" or somthing like that, I'm translating here from the German version This feature goes through all selected folders and creates the thumbnails for each image on the disk.
It can take a few hours, if you have thousands of images like I do, but it is only done once, while I'm sleeping, and then afterwards those thumbs all appear instantly.
Only faststone. Its free and fast. Stoped using acdsee when it was 10 ver. I've got to say, I'm underwhelmed. The interesting changes are for the users of the edit tab the 'destrcutive', bit mapped editor.
Nothing really new there for the person who shoots raw. If you haven't used ACDSee Pro before, using this will be a great experience, because it's a good product. But frankly, the reason to upgrade from Pro 7 to Pro 8 seems non-existent for me as an existing user. They've tried to incorporate their 'online' drive service a bit more seamlessly into the overall user interface, which is nice if you are a user of that service, I guess, but considering the recent price reductions for Google Drive and others, it seems pretty pricey to me.
Too pricey IMO. I might recommend interested people to try the editing allowed by color selection They call it 'pixel targeting'. I don't use ACDSee but my software does allow me to edit some by color and that is very nice because I don't have to make masks unless I want to further restrict the adjustment.
Now, if the color edits are on destructive layers I presumed they were effective with RAW. That is the best way to use them There is already a similar process in the raw development.
This is really just a catch up for the bit mapped editor. Do you mean there is already something like the 'pixel targeting' in the raw development mode of ver PRO7?
At this point, I am inclined to say that I am uncertain what pixel targeting actually brings to the table in practical terms. My unproven suspicion is, that it brings just a different user interface to an existing set of color algorithms. That isn't a bad thing, sometimes a different UI can make things easier for some people. But at this point, I'm not sure that it adds NEW functionality. I am continuing to test and evaluate.
My suspicions may be faulty and am willing to retract if I'm proven wrong. It is easy to use and works well for my needs. So no OS-X compatibility then There is a version 3 for Mac available for latest OS. The windows versions now at version 8 has the most developed features.
However for the low cost of either software definitely worth buying. There is also an online interface for sharing photos I really like. Try the trial version to see if you like it. All have their specific uses for what I do. Well, being able to work with color selections, Pixel Targeting, will be nice.
I think many people will like this. More and more, I wish manufactures would group 'stuff that makes auto decisions' from 'new stuff that lets you do different things'. Lightroom supports the X trans cameras version 5 , not sure on earlier versions of Lightroom, and of course the bundled Raw converter that comes with the Fuji camera - Silkypix I think it is.
Maybe in future? Anyone know? Steelhead3: The Fuji X cameras are hardly "off-brand" at this point. I like the program as a viewer, but the fact that it can't show X-Pro 1 or X20 raw files is pathetic.
If you use these cameras, I would suggest looking somewhere else. Their rotation tool is a good example. I also like their crop tool and other features in Edit mode. I have not yet tried this latest version, but I am headed that way now. Just a note. The reason for the high speed rendering of an image in Acdsee, is because it is set to display the embedded jpg image from the raw file by default.
If high quality decode is selected in Acdsee, it is still around twice as fast as Lightroom at loading an image. I've mentioned this already in the past on your feedback forum, after the version 6 and 7 came along, that an update of your database would make sense.
Perhaps you can now update your database to show PRO 8 is here! I just downloaded the trial version of Acdsee Pro 8 and it is really, really fast at loading the large raw image files from my D Very impressive indeed. Also the default output which is shown from the NEF-files looks much nicer in AcdSee compared to the flat files presented in LR before editing. I have used Acdsee Pro 5 some years ago, but it had some limitations like not being able to make local edits and it had no lens profiles.
Acdsee Pro 8 now has local edits, so I'm seriously considering this as a viewer and possibly an editor instead of LR even though it still does not have lens profiles. I'd be more then happy to pay extra for a clean, super fast viewer. I see all these blabla features but all I read is "we've developed all these new cumbursome features making sure this new version won't perform any better on your speedy hardware But even though ACDsee is fast, for others all these feature are nothing more then slowdown..
Just downloaded the trial - very fast software, great UI, supports bit per channel, and can even perform good looking tone mapping - looks like much better product than Elements or PSP. Thanks for posting it. Adam Forrester The only thing I'd like to see is tool developers in general focus on really speeding up their tool. Everybody wants speed. Not everybody wants all their new features. But that's not only ACDSee btw. When I look at my raw images on the hard disk, their thumbs appear almost instantaneously because I use the database feature in ACDSee called "catalogue folders" or somthing like that, I'm translating here from the German version This feature goes through all selected folders and creates the thumbnails for each image on the disk.
It can take a few hours, if you have thousands of images like I do, but it is only done once, while I'm sleeping, and then afterwards those thumbs all appear instantly. Only faststone. Its free and fast. Stoped using acdsee when it was 10 ver. I've got to say, I'm underwhelmed. The interesting changes are for the users of the edit tab the 'destrcutive', bit mapped editor. Nothing really new there for the person who shoots raw. If you haven't used ACDSee Pro before, using this will be a great experience, because it's a good product.
But frankly, the reason to upgrade from Pro 7 to Pro 8 seems non-existent for me as an existing user. They've tried to incorporate their 'online' drive service a bit more seamlessly into the overall user interface, which is nice if you are a user of that service, I guess, but considering the recent price reductions for Google Drive and others, it seems pretty pricey to me.
Too pricey IMO. I might recommend interested people to try the editing allowed by color selection They call it 'pixel targeting'. I don't use ACDSee but my software does allow me to edit some by color and that is very nice because I don't have to make masks unless I want to further restrict the adjustment. Now, if the color edits are on destructive layers I presumed they were effective with RAW.
That is the best way to use them There is already a similar process in the raw development. This is really just a catch up for the bit mapped editor.
Do you mean there is already something like the 'pixel targeting' in the raw development mode of ver PRO7? At this point, I am inclined to say that I am uncertain what pixel targeting actually brings to the table in practical terms.
My unproven suspicion is, that it brings just a different user interface to an existing set of color algorithms. That isn't a bad thing, sometimes a different UI can make things easier for some people.
But at this point, I'm not sure that it adds NEW functionality. I am continuing to test and evaluate. My suspicions may be faulty and am willing to retract if I'm proven wrong. It is easy to use and works well for my needs. So no OS-X compatibility then There is a version 3 for Mac available for latest OS. The windows versions now at version 8 has the most developed features.
However for the low cost of either software definitely worth buying. There is also an online interface for sharing photos I really like. Try the trial version to see if you like it. All have their specific uses for what I do. Well, being able to work with color selections, Pixel Targeting, will be nice. I think many people will like this.
More and more, I wish manufactures would group 'stuff that makes auto decisions' from 'new stuff that lets you do different things'. Lightroom supports the X trans cameras version 5 , not sure on earlier versions of Lightroom, and of course the bundled Raw converter that comes with the Fuji camera - Silkypix I think it is. Maybe in future? Anyone know? Steelhead3: The Fuji X cameras are hardly "off-brand" at this point. I like the program as a viewer, but the fact that it can't show X-Pro 1 or X20 raw files is pathetic.
If you use these cameras, I would suggest looking somewhere else. Their rotation tool is a good example. I also like their crop tool and other features in Edit mode. I have not yet tried this latest version, but I am headed that way now.
Just a note. The reason for the high speed rendering of an image in Acdsee, is because it is set to display the embedded jpg image from the raw file by default. If high quality decode is selected in Acdsee, it is still around twice as fast as Lightroom at loading an image. I've mentioned this already in the past on your feedback forum, after the version 6 and 7 came along, that an update of your database would make sense.
Perhaps you can now update your database to show PRO 8 is here! I just downloaded the trial version of Acdsee Pro 8 and it is really, really fast at loading the large raw image files from my D Very impressive indeed. Also the default output which is shown from the NEF-files looks much nicer in AcdSee compared to the flat files presented in LR before editing.
I have used Acdsee Pro 5 some years ago, but it had some limitations like not being able to make local edits and it had no lens profiles.
Acdsee Pro 8 now has local edits, so I'm seriously considering this as a viewer and possibly an editor instead of LR even though it still does not have lens profiles.
I'd be more then happy to pay extra for a clean, super fast viewer. I see all these blabla features but all I read is "we've developed all these new cumbursome features making sure this new version won't perform any better on your speedy hardware But even though ACDsee is fast, for others all these feature are nothing more then slowdown..
Just downloaded the trial - very fast software, great UI, supports bit per channel, and can even perform good looking tone mapping - looks like much better product than Elements or PSP. Thanks for posting it. Adam Forrester I tinkered with it this morning I';ve been promoting Zoner for years now It's no excuse for me to wait for some bundles A software has a price and if they want to compete as alternative to other vendors they should do it an a normal base.
While it boasted quite a few advanced features, it was accompanied by a hefty price tag. DJI has pared down this offering a bit with their latest subg release, the Mini 3. Is it worth the investment? It's powered by the same impressive tech that guides self-driving vehicles and can detect and avoid obstacles from every angle. Can it overcome a lackluster camera to win hearts and minds? The latest iteration of ON1 Software's flagship Raw editor is jam-packed with AI smarts that aim to lighten your workload by taking subjects into account when making selections, applying presets, keywording and more.
Find out if it's right for you in our review! Every year, DJI releases a new consumer-grade smartphone gimbal. The Osmo Mobile 6 is the latest model in the series. Is it good enough to enhance your videos and photos? We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage.
We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action?
Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. The Orion spacecraft will be landing off the coast of Baja California this weekend.
On December 5, Orion's 20th day in space, the spacecraft performed its longest engine burn and captured some of its best photos of the moon. The new lenses remain essentially unchanged from their Sony E-mount and L-mount siblings, which were released earlier this year.
Watch as photographer Markus Hofstaetter restores a year-old Century No. Apple has announced it intends to release advanced security features to protect various data stored on iCloud, including photos. The new photo protection adds full end-to-end encryption for users' saved images, provided they opt-in to the new Advanced Data Protection option. Creativity comes in ebbs and flows. Recognize your pattern, kill your ego and embrace what you don't know to improve your skills, fast, and remain a lifelong learner.
Chinese smartphone maker Tecno has announced a new flagship smartphone at an event in Dubai.
❿
No comments:
Post a Comment